Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2003 Aug 19;100(17):9918-22.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1633296100. Epub 2003 Aug 6.

A large-scale, gene-driven mutagenesis approach for the functional analysis of the mouse genome

Affiliations

A large-scale, gene-driven mutagenesis approach for the functional analysis of the mouse genome

Jens Hansen et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

A major challenge of the postgenomic era is the functional characterization of every single gene within the mammalian genome. In an effort to address this challenge, we assembled a collection of mutations in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, which is the largest publicly accessible collection of such mutations to date. Using four different gene-trap vectors, we generated 5,142 sequences adjacent to the gene-trap integration sites (gene-trap sequence tags; http://genetrap.de) from >11,000 ES cell clones. Although most of the gene-trap vector insertions occurred randomly throughout the genome, we found both vector-independent and vector-specific integration "hot spots." Because >50% of the hot spots were vector-specific, we conclude that the most effective way to saturate the mouse genome with gene-trap insertions is by using a combination of gene-trap vectors. When a random sample of gene-trap integrations was passaged to the germ line, 59% (17 of 29) produced an observable phenotype in transgenic mice, a frequency similar to that achieved by conventional gene targeting. Thus, gene trapping allows a large-scale and cost-effective production of ES cell clones with mutations distributed throughout the genome, a resource likely to accelerate genome annotation and the in vivo modeling of human disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Correlation between gene-trap insertions and the number of UniGene clusters per chromosome.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Number of gene-trap (GT) insertions into annotated hot spots. All genes with two or more insertions were classified as hot spots. Gene lengths were derived from GenBank.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Frequency of gene-trap (GT) insertions into unique UniGene clusters. Data points represent the number of novel UniGene clusters accumulating with every 50 insertions. For further explanation see text.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brown, S. D. & Balling, R. (2001) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11, 268–273. - PubMed
    1. Beier, D. R. (2000) Mamm. Genome 11, 594–597. - PubMed
    1. Floss, T. & Wurst, W. (2002) Methods Mol. Biol. 185, 347–379. - PubMed
    1. Stanford, W. L., Cohn, J. B. & Cordes, S. P. (2001) Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 756–768. - PubMed
    1. Hicks, G. G., Shi, E. G., Chen, J., Roshon, M., Williamson, D., Scherer, C. & Ruley, H. E. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 254, 263–275. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources