Abstract
The decline in intergroup relations evident in myriad conflicts around the world has far-reaching implications: it erodes trust and cooperation at both the individual and societal levels, hinders effective societal functioning and threatens the well-being of individuals living in such contexts. In response, researchers have developed evidence-based interventions aimed at improving intergroup relations and cultivating societies that are more inclusive, tolerant and peaceful. However, a ‘one intervention fits all’ approach persists. In this Review, we consolidate research from four domains in social psychology (prejudice reduction, conflict resolution, intergroup reconciliation and affective polarization) to elucidate the critical features necessary for successful intergroup interventions. Specifically, we consider the importance of identifying meaningful intervention goals (what), crucial characteristics of intervention recipients (who) and key contextual features (where) for optimizing interventions. We also describe how motivation and conformity might present barriers to the successful implementation of intergroup interventions in the real world and we suggest ways to overcome these challenges. A thorough understanding of the features that influence intervention outcomes will enable effective personalization and contextualization of existing interventions and development of new ones.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$59.00 per year
only $4.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Uppsala Conflict Data Program. UCDP https://ucdp.uu.se/ (2022).
Esteban, J., Mayoral, L. & Ray, D. Ethnicity and conflict: an empirical study. Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 1310–1342 (2012).
Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T. & Marcus, E. C. The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice (John Wiley & Sons, 2011).
Hegre, H. & Nygård, H. M. Governance and conflict relapse. J. Confl. Resolut. 59, 984–1016 (2015).
Von Einsiedel, S., Bosetti, L., Cockayne, J., Salih, C. & Wan, W. Civil war trends and the changing nature of armed conflict. UNU CPR https://unu.edu/cpr/project/civil-war-trends-and-changing-nature-armed-conflict (2017).
Cehajic, S., Brown, R. & Castano, E. Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Polit. Psychol. 29, 351–367 (2008).
Fiske, S. T. What we know now about bias and intergroup conflict, the problem of the century. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11, 123–128 (2002).
Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. & Cairns, E. Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 35, 45–59 (2009).
Schmid, K. & Muldoon, O. T. Perceived threat, social identification, and psychological well‐being: the effects of political conflict exposure. Polit. Psychol. 36, 75–92 (2015).
Halperin, E., Hameiri, B. & Littman, R. Psychological Intergroup Interventions: Evidence-Based Approaches to Improve Intergroup Relations (Taylor & Francis, 2023). This handbook provides a systematic and comprehensive overview of existing psychological intergroup interventions.
Čehajić-Clancy, S., Goldenberg, A., Gross, J. J. & Halperin, E. Social-psychological interventions for intergroup reconciliation: an emotion regulation perspective. Psychol. Inq. 27, 73–88 (2016). This paper proposed regulation of group-based emotions as an important process underlying the effectiveness of intergroup interventions.
Hartman, R. et al. Interventions to reduce partisan animosity. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 1194–1205 (2022).
Čehajić‐Clancy, S., Janković, A., Opačin, N. & Bilewicz, M. The process of becoming ‘we’ in an intergroup conflict context: how enhancing intergroup moral similarities leads to common‐ingroup identity. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 62, 1251–1270 (2023).
Brewer, M. B. Intergroup Relations (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).
Paluck, E. L., Porat, R., Clark, C. S. & Green, D. P. Prejudice reduction: progress and challenges. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 72, 533–560 (2021). This paper reviews the effectiveness and limitations of experimental studies aimed at prejudice reduction by proposing specific limitations of the field and ways of overcoming those.
Nadler, A., Malloy, T. & Fisher, J. D. Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation (Oxford Univ. Press, 2008).
Hameiri, B., Nabet, E., Bar-Tal, D. & Halperin, E. Paradoxical thinking as a conflict-resolution intervention: comparison to alternative interventions and examination of psychological mechanisms. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 44, 122–139 (2018).
Bilali, R. & Staub, E. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice (eds Sibley, C. G. & Barlow, F. K.) 607–631 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).
Halperin, E., Russell, A. G., Trzesniewski, K. H., Gross, J. J. & Dweck, C. S. Promoting the Middle East peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability. Science 333, 1767–1769 (2011).
Avichail, T., Tamir, M., Gross, J. J. & Halperin, E. in Psychological Intergroup Interventions (Sherman, D. K, Gibbs, W. C. & Binning, K. R.) 99–113 (Routledge, 2023).
Cohen-Chen, S., Goldenberg, A., Gross, J. J. & Halperin, E. in Psychological Intergroup Interventions (Sherman, D. K, Gibbs, W. C. & Binning, K. R.) 86–98 (Routledge, 2023).
Sherman, D. K., Gibbs, W. C. & Binning, K. R. in Psychological Intergroup Interventions (Sherman, D. K, Gibbs, W. C. & Binning, K. R.) ch. 6 (Routledge, 2023).
Murrar, S. & Brauer, M. in Psychological Intergroup Interventions (Sherman, D. K, Gibbs, W. C. & Binning, K. R.) ch. 4 (Routledge, 2023).
Hameiri, B., Bar-Tal, D. & Halperin, E. Challenges for peacemakers: how to overcome socio-psychological barriers. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 1, 164–171 (2014).
Ditlmann, R. K., Samii, C. & Zeitzoff, T. Addressing violent intergroup conflict from the bottom up? Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 11, 38–77 (2017). This paper reviews the effectiveness of individual-level interventions.
Čehajić-Clancy, S. & Bilewicz, M. Moral-exemplar intervention: a new paradigm for conflict resolution and intergroup reconciliation. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 30, 335–342 (2021).
Littman, R., Scacco, A. & Weiss, C. in Psychological Intergroup Interventions (Sherman, D. K, Gibbs, W. C. & Binning, K. R.) 3–16 (Routledge, 2024).
Blaylock, D., Turner, R. N. & Crisp, R. J. in Psychological Intergroup Interventions (Sherman, D. K, Gibbs, W. C. & Binning, K. R.) 17–30 (Routledge, 2023).
Witkowska, M., Bilewicz, M. & Čehajić-Clancy, S. in Psychological Intergroup Interventions (Sherman, D. K, Gibbs, W. C. & Binning, K. R.) 126–135 (Routledge, 2022).
Mousa, S. Building social cohesion between Christians and Muslims through soccer in post-ISIS Iraq. Science 369, 866–870 (2020). This paper demonstrates the effectiveness and the limits of contact-based approaches to improving intergroup relations using field experiments.
Burrows, B., Tropp, L. R., Dehrone, T. A. & Čehajić-Clancy, S. How intergroup contact shapes intergroup attitudes and construals of relations between ethnic groups: evidence from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Peace Confl. J. Peace Psychol. 28, 372–383 (2022).
Čehajić-Clancy, S. & Olsson, A. Threaten and affirm: the role of ingroup moral exemplars for promoting prosocial intergroup behavior through affirming moral identity. Group Process. Intergroup Relat 27, 136843022211483 (2023).
Shuman, E. et al. Advancing support for intergroup equality via a self-affirmation campaign. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 26, 1888–1908 (2022).
Hameiri, B. & Moore-Berg, S. L. Intervention tournaments: an overview of concept, design, and implementation. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1525–1540 (2022). This paper proposes a new experimental design that compares several interventions against a single control condition.
Landry, A. P. & Halperin, E. Intergroup psychological interventions: the motivational challenge. Am. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001289 (2023). This paper addresses the issue of motivation in studying and implementing intergroup interventions.
Bar‐Tal, D. & Hameiri, B. Interventions to change well‐anchored attitudes in the context of intergroup conflict. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 14, e12534 (2020).
Halperin, E. & Schori‐Eyal, N. Towards a new framework of personalized psychological interventions to improve intergroup relations and promote peace. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 14, 255–270 (2020). This paper presents a framework for personalization of intergroup interventions.
Čehajić-Clancy, S. & Bilewicz, M. Fostering reconciliation through historical moral exemplars in a postconflict society. Peace Confl. J. Peace Psychol. 23, 288–296 (2017).
Čehajić-Clancy, S., Effron, D. A., Halperin, E., Liberman, V. & Ross, L. D. Affirmation, acknowledgment of in-group responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101, 256–270 (2011).
Halperin, E., Pliskin, R., Saguy, T., Liberman, V. & Gross, J. J. Emotion regulation and the cultivation of political tolerance: searching for a new track for intervention. J. Confl. Resolut. 58, 1110–1138 (2014).
Galinsky, A. D. & Ku, G. The effects of perspective-taking on prejudice: the moderating role of self-evaluation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30, 594–604 (2004).
Bilali, R. & Vollhardt, J. R. Priming effects of a reconciliation radio drama on historical perspective-taking in the aftermath of mass violence in Rwanda. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, 144–151 (2013).
Čehajić‐Clancy, S. & Bilewicz, M. Appealing to moral exemplars: shared perception of morality as an essential ingredient of intergroup reconciliation. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 14, 217–243 (2020).
Kalla, J. L. & Broockman, D. E. Reducing exclusionary attitudes through interpersonal conversation: evidence from three field experiments. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 114, 410–425 (2020).
Levendusky, M. S. Americans, not partisans: can priming american national identity reduce affective polarization? J. Polit. 80, 59–70 (2018).
Kubin, E., Puryear, C., Schein, C. & Gray, K. Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2008389118 (2021).
Walton, G. M. The new science of wise psychological interventions. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23, 73–82 (2014).
Goldenberg, A. et al. Testing the impact and durability of a group malleability intervention in the context of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 696–701 (2018).
Murrar, S., Campbell, M. R. & Brauer, M. Exposure to peers’ pro-diversity attitudes increases inclusion and reduces the achievement gap. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 889–897 (2020).
Endevelt, K., Halperin, E. & Porat, R. Zoom out: an intervention on the virtual learning environment improves minority students’ grades in two field experiments in Israel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2313496121 (2024).
Littman, R., Bilali, R. & Hameiri, B. in Psychological Intergroup Interventions (Sherman, D. K, Gibbs, W. C. & Binning, K. R.) 165–177 (Routledge, 2023).
Badea, C. & Sherman, D. K. Self-affirmation and prejudice reduction: when and why? Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 28, 40–46 (2019).
Badea, C., Binning, K., Verlhiac, J.-F. & Sherman, D. K. In the aftermath of terrorism: effects of self versus group affirmation on support for discriminatory policies. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 76, 421–428 (2018).
Halperin, E. & Schori‐Eyal, N. Towards a new framework of personalized psychological interventions to improve intergroup relations and promote peace. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 14, 255–270 (2020).
Dixon, J., Tropp, L. R., Durrheim, K. & Tredoux, C. “Let them eat harmony”: prejudice-reduction strategies and attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19, 76–80 (2010).
Reimer, N. K. & Sengupta, N. K. Meta-analysis of the “ironic” effects of intergroup contact. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 124, 362–380 (2023).
Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F. & Pratto, F. The irony of harmony: intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychol. Sci. 20, 114–121 (2009).
Dixon, J. ‘Thinking ill of others without sufficient warrant?’ Transcending the accuracy–inaccuracy dualism in prejudice and stereotyping research. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 56, 4–27 (2017).
Brauer, M. Stuck on intergroup attitudes: the need to shift gears to change intergroup behaviors. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 19, 280–294 (2023).
Kollmuss, A. & Agyeman, J. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Educ. Res. 8, 239–260 (2002).
Mortensen, C. R. et al. Trending norms: a lever for encouraging behaviors performed by the minority. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 10, 201–210 (2019).
Prentice, D. & Paluck, E. L. Engineering social change using social norms: lessons from the study of collective action. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 35, 138–142 (2020).
Tankard, M. E. & Paluck, E. L. The effect of a supreme court decision regarding gay marriage on social norms and personal attitudes. Psychol. Sci. 28, 1334–1344 (2017).
Bruneau, E., Hameiri, B., Moore-Berg, S. L. & Kteily, N. Intergroup contact reduces dehumanization and meta-dehumanization: cross-sectional, longitudinal, and quasi-experimental evidence from 16 samples in five countries. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 47, 906–920 (2021).
Lees, J. & Cikara, M. Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 279–286 (2020).
Kteily, N., Hodson, G. & Bruneau, E. They see us as less than human: metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 110, 343–370 (2016).
Moore-Berg, S. L., Ankori-Karlinsky, L.-O., Hameiri, B. & Bruneau, E. Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 14864–14872 (2020).
Shnabel, N. & Nadler, A. A needs-based model of reconciliation: satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94, 116–132 (2008).
Ford, B. Q., Feinberg, M., Lam, P., Mauss, I. B. & John, O. P. Using reappraisal to regulate negative emotion after the 2016 US Presidential election: does emotion regulation trump political action? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 117, 998–1015 (2019).
Solak, N., Tamir, M., Sümer, N., Jost, J. T. & Halperin, E. Expressive suppression as an obstacle to social change: linking system justification, emotion regulation, and collective action. Motiv. Emot. 45, 661–682 (2021).
Brock-Petroshius, K., Garcia-Perez, J., Gross, M. & Abrams, L. Colorblind attitudes, empathy, and shame: preparing white students for anti-racist social work practice. J. Soc. Work. Educ. 59, 346–360 (2023).
Iyer, A., Leach, C. W. & Crosby, F. J. White guilt and racial compensation: the benefits and limits of self-focus. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29, 117–129 (2003).
Reifen Tagar, M., Morgan, G. S., Halperin, E. & Skitka, L. J. When ideology matters: moral conviction and the association between ideology and policy preferences in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 44, 117–125 (2014).
Harel, T. O., Maoz, I. & Halperin, E. A conflict within a conflict: intragroup ideological polarization and intergroup intractable conflict. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 34, 52–57 (2020).
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N. & Westwood, S. J. The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 22, 129–146 (2019).
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M. & Napier, J. L. Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60, 307–337 (2009).
Hitlin, S. & Pinkston, K. in Handbook of Social Psychology (eds DeLamater, J. & Ward, A.) 319–339 (Springer, 2013).
Altemeyer, B. Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism (Jossey-Bass, 1988).
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Van Laar, C. & Levin, S. Social dominance theory: its agenda and method. Polit. Psychol. 25, 845–880 (2004).
Zmigrod, L. The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies: theory, evidence, and future directions. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 34, 34–39 (2020).
Jost, J. T. & Amodio, D. M. Political ideology as motivated social cognition: behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motiv. Emot. 36, 55–64 (2012).
Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. H. & Davidov, E. Basic personal values and the meaning of left‐right political orientations in 20 countries. Polit. Psychol. 32, 537–561 (2011).
Ruisch, B. C. et al. Examining the left–right divide through the lens of a global crisis: ideological differences and their implications for responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Polit. Psychol. 42, 795–816 (2021).
Feinberg, M. & Willer, R. Moral reframing: a technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 13, e12501 (2019).
Voelkel, J. G. & Feinberg, M. Morally reframed arguments can affect support for political candidates. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 9, 917–924 (2018).
Winterich, K. P., Aquino, K., Mittal, V. & Swartz, R. When moral identity symbolization motivates prosocial behavior: the role of recognition and moral identity internalization. J. Appl. Psychol. 98, 759–770 (2013).
Brannon, T. N., Carter, E. R., Murdock‐Perriera, L. A. & Higginbotham, G. D. From backlash to inclusion for all: instituting diversity efforts to maximize benefits across group lines. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 12, 57–90 (2018).
Argüello-Gutiérrez, C., López-Rodríguez, L. & Vázquez, A. The effect of moral foundations on intergroup relations: the salience of fairness promotes the acceptance of minority groups. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 15, 194855062311621 (2023).
Halperin, E. & Pliskin, R. Emotions and emotion regulation in intractable conflict: studying emotional processes within a unique context. Polit. Psychol. 36, 119–150 (2015).
Halperin, E. Emotional barriers to peace: emotions and public opinion of Jewish Israelis about the peace process in the Middle East. Peace Confl. J. Peace Psychol. 17, 22–45 (2011).
Snyder, C. R. The past and possible futures of hope. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 19, 11–28 (2000).
Roseman, I. J. Cognitive determinants of emotion: a structural theory. Rev. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 5, 11–36 (1984).
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T. & Smith, E. R. Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79, 602–616 (2000).
Berkowitz, L. Aggression: Its Causes, Consequences, and Control (McGraw-Hill, 1993).
Halperin, E. Group-based hatred in intractable conflict in Israel. J. Confl. Resolut. 52, 713–736 (2008).
Goldberg, L. R. An alternative ‘description of personality’: the big-five factor structure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59, 1216–1229 (1990).
Crawford, J. T. & Brandt, M. J. Who is prejudiced, and toward whom? The big five traits and generalized prejudice. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 45, 1455–1467 (2019).
Sibley, C. G. & Duckitt, J. Personality and prejudice: a meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 12, 248–279 (2008).
Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M. & Zakrisson, I. What matters most to prejudice: big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right‐wing authoritarianism? Eur. J. Personal. 18, 463–482 (2004).
Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., Grob, A., Suh, E. M. & Shao, L. Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79, 452–468 (2000).
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H. & Knafo, A. The big five personality factors and personal values. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28, 789–801 (2002).
Graziano, W. G. & Eisenberg, N. in Handbook of Personality Psychology (eds. Hogan, R., Johnson, J. A. & Briggs S. R.) 795–824 (Elsevier, 1997).
Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S. & Goldberg, L. R. The structure of conscientiousness: an empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Pers. Psychol. 58, 103–139 (2005).
Carver, C. S., Sutton, S. K. & Scheier, M. F. Action, emotion, and personality: emerging conceptual integration. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26, 741–751 (2000).
Hirsh, J. B. & Inzlicht, M. The devil you know: neuroticism predicts neural response to uncertainty. Psychol. Sci. 19, 962–967 (2008).
Fritsche, I., Jonas, E. & Kessler, T. Collective reactions to threat: implications for intergroup conflict and for solving societal crises: collective reactions to threat. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 5, 101–136 (2011).
Jonas, E. et al. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 49, 219–286 (Elsevier, 2014).
Tajfel, H. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 33, 1–39 (1982).
Brewer, M. B. Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. Soc. Cogn. 11, 150–164 (1993).
Park, J. H. & Van Leeuwen, F. In Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology (eds Zeigler-Hill, V., Welling, L. L. M. & Shackelford, T. K.) 115–125 (Springer, 2015).
Hirschberger, G. & Shuster, B. in The Tribal Mind: The Psychology of Collectivism (Visegrad International Symposium on Social Psychology) (ed. Forgas, J.) (2024).
Noor, M., James Brown, R. & Prentice, G. Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: a new model. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 47, 481–495 (2008).
Harris, L. T. & Fiske, S. T. Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychol. Sci. 17, 847–853 (2006).
Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W. & Gaertner, S. L. Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: a meta-analytic review. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10, 336–353 (2006).
Voelkel, J. G. et al. Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 55–64 (2023).
Pettigrew, T. F. The emergence of contextual social psychology. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 44, 963–971 (2018). This paper calls for an empirical approach to systematically examine the impact of social context in the field of social psychology.
Pettigrew, T. F. & Hewstone, M. The single factor fallacy: implications of missing critical variables from an analysis of intergroup contact theory. Soc. Issues Policy Rev. 11, 8–37 (2017).
Christ, O. et al. Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3996–4000 (2014).
Čehajić-Clancy, S., Lindner, C., Gelfort, P., Elad-Strenger, J. & Kessler, T. Where you live matters more than who you know: context-level contact as a stronger predictor of post-war reconciliation than individual-level contact. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/skz5v (2023). This paper establishes the importance of social context for post-war reconciliation.
Halperin, E., Russell, A. G., Dweck, C. S. & Gross, J. J. Anger, hatred, and the quest for peace: anger can be constructive in the absence of hatred. J. Confl. Resolut. 55, 274–291 (2011).
Cohen-Chen, S., Halperin, E., Crisp, R. J. & Gross, J. J. Hope in the Middle East: malleability beliefs, hope, and the willingness to compromise for peace. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 5, 67–75 (2014).
Cohen-Chen, S., Crisp, R. J. & Halperin, E. A new appraisal-based framework underlying hope in conflict resolution. Emot. Rev. 9, 208–214 (2017).
Paluck, E. L., Green, S. A. & Green, D. P. The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behav. Public. Policy 3, 129–158 (2019).
Hässler, T. et al. Need satisfaction in intergroup contact: a multinational study of pathways toward social change. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 122, 634 (2022).
Hakim, N. et al. Turning the lens in the study of precarity: on experimental social psychology’s acquiescence to the settler–colonial status quo in historic Palestine. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 62, 21–38 (2023).
Dovidio, J. F. et al. in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation (eds Nadler, A., Malloy, T. E. & Fisher, J. D.) 227–253 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2008).
Wagner, U., Christ, O., Pettigrew, T. F., Stellmacher, J. & Wolf, C. Prejudice and minority proportion: contact instead of threat effects. Soc. Psychol. Q. 69, 380–390 (2006).
Binder, J. et al. Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96, 843–856 (2009).
Tropp, L. R. Perceived discrimination and interracial contact: predicting interracial closeness among black and white Americans. Soc. Psychol. Q. 70, 70–81 (2007).
Bruneau, E. G. & Saxe, R. The power of being heard: the benefits of ‘perspective-giving’ in the context of intergroup conflict. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48, 855–866 (2012).
Pratto, F. & Stewart, A. L. Power dynamics in intergroup relations. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 33, 250–255 (2020).
Knowles, E. D., Lowery, B. S., Chow, R. M. & Unzueta, M. M. Deny, distance, or dismantle? How white Americans manage a privileged identity. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 9, 594–609 (2014).
Shuman, E., Saguy, T., van Zomeren, M. & Halperin, E. Disrupting the system constructively: testing the effectiveness of nonnormative nonviolent collective action. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 121, 819–841 (2021).
Hässler, T., Shnabel, N., Ullrich, J., Arditti-Vogel, A. & SimanTov-Nachlieli, I. Individual differences in system justification predict power and morality-related needs in advantaged and disadvantaged groups in response to group disparity. Group. Process. Intergroup Relat. 22, 746–766 (2019).
Kahalon, R., Shnabel, N., Halabi, S. & SimanTov‐Nachlieli, I. Power matters: the role of power and morality needs in competitive victimhood among advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 58, 452–472 (2019).
Sharvit, K., Brambilla, M., Babush, M. & Colucci, F. P. To feel or not to feel when my group harms others? the regulation of collective guilt as motivated reasoning. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41, 1223–1235 (2015).
Blanchard, F. A., Lilly, T. & Vaughn, L. A. Reducing the expression of racial prejudice. Psychol. Sci. 2, 101–105 (1991).
Kelman, H. C. in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation (eds Nadler, A., Malloy, T. E. & Fisher, J. D.) 15–32 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2008).
Crocker, J., Garcia, J. A. & Nuer, N. in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation (eds Nadler, A., Malloy, T. E. & Fisher, J. D.) 171–194 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2008).
Sherif, M. The Psychology of Social Norms (Harper, 1936).
Saguy, T. & Reifen-Tagar, M. The social psychological roots of violent intergroup conflict. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 1, 577–589 (2022).
Mackie, D. M. & Smith, E. R. Intergroup relations: insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psychol. Rev. 105, 499 (1998).
Yzerbyt, V. & Demoulin, S. in Handbook of Social Psychology 5th edn (eds Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T. & Lindzey, G.) 1024–1083 (John Wiley & Sons, 2010).
Mironova, V. & Whitt, S. Social norms after conflict exposure and victimization by violence: experimental evidence from Kosovo. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 48, 749–765 (2018).
Sharvit, K., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Raviv, A. & Gurevich, R. Ideological orientation and social context as moderators of the effect of terrorism: the case of Israeli-Jewish public opinion regarding peace. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 40, 105–121 (2009).
Moore-Berg, S. L., Hameiri, B. & Bruneau, E. The prime psychological suspects of toxic political polarization. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 34, 199–204 (2020).
Pasek, M. H., Ankori-Karlinsky, L.-O., Levy-Vene, A. & Moore-Berg, S. L. Misperceptions about out-partisans’ democratic values may erode democracy. Sci. Rep. 12, 16284 (2022).
Moore-Berg, S. L. in Psychological Intergroup Interventions (Sherman, D. K, Gibbs, W. C. & Binning, K. R.) 136–148 (Routledge, 2024).
Kruglanski, A. W. The Psychology of Closed Mindedness (Psychology Press, 2013).
Bar-Tal, D. & Halperin, E. in Intergroup Conflicts and their Resolution: A Social Psychological Perspective (ed. Bar-Tal, D.) 217–239 (Psychology Press, 2011).
Ross, L. & Ward, A. Psychological barriers to dispute resolution. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 27, 255–304 (Elsevier, 1995).
Schwartz, S. H. et al. Refining the theory of basic individual values. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 103, 663 (2012).
Nasie, M., Bar-Tal, D., Pliskin, R., Nahhas, E. & Halperin, E. Overcoming the barrier of narrative adherence in conflicts through awareness of the psychological bias of naïve realism. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 40, 1543–1556 (2014).
Porat, R., Halperin, E. & Tamir, M. What we want is what we get: group-based emotional preferences and conflict resolution. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 110, 167–190 (2016).
Hasson, Y. et al. The enemy’s gaze: immersive virtual environments enhance peace promoting attitudes and emotions in violent intergroup conflicts. PLoS One 14, e0222342 (2019).
Porat, R., Tamir, M. & Halperin, E. Group-based emotion regulation: a motivated approach. Emotion 20, 16–20 (2020).
Čehajić-Clancy, S., Jamshed, N., Olsson. A. & Momčilović, A. From inspiration to restoration: moral elevation as a catalyst for improving intergroup relations in contexts of conflict. J. Person. Social Psychol. (in the press).
De La Sablonnière, R. et al. The impact of national integration policies on prejudice and psychological well‐being: the fundamental role of the clarity and coherence of integration policies. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 50, 614–633 (2020).
Schlueter, E., Meuleman, B. & Davidov, E. Immigrant integration policies and perceived group threat: a multilevel study of 27 western and eastern European countries. Soc. Sci. Res. 42, 670–682 (2013).
Idan, O., Halperin, E., Hameiri, B. & Reifen Tagar, M. A rose by any other name? A subtle linguistic cue impacts anger and corresponding policy support in intractable conflict. Psychol. Sci. 29, 972–983 (2018).
Lowe, M. Types of contact: a field experiment on collaborative and adversarial caste integration. Am. Econ. Rev. 111, 1807–1844 (2021).
Scacco, A. & Warren, S. S. Can social contact reduce prejudice and discrimination? Evidence from a field experiment in Nigeria. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 112, 654–677 (2018).
Munger, K. Tweetment effects on the tweeted: experimentally reducing racist harassment. Polit. Behav. 39, 629–649 (2017).
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R. & Kallgren, C. A. A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58, 1015–1026 (1990).
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B. & Griskevicius, V. A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consum. Res. 35, 472–482 (2008).
Paluck, E. L., Shepherd, H. & Aronow, P. M. Changing climates of conflict: a social network experiment in 56 schools. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 566–571 (2016).
Mertens, S., Herberz, M., Hahnel, U. J. J. & Brosch, T. The effectiveness of nudging: a meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2107346118 (2022).
Cialdini, R. B. & Goldstein, N. J. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 591–621 (2004).
Epley, N., Caruso, E. M. & Bazerman, M. H. When perspective taking increases taking: reactive egoism in social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91, 872–889 (2006).
Okimoto, T. G. & Wenzel, M. The other side of perspective taking: transgression ambiguity and victims’ revenge against their offender. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 2, 373–378 (2011).
Vorauer, J. D. & Sasaki, S. J. Helpful only in the abstract?: ironic effects of empathy in intergroup interaction. Psychol. Sci. 20, 191–197 (2009).
Borinca, I., Andrighetto, L., Valsecchi, G. & Berent, J. Ingroup norms shape understanding of outgroup prosocial behaviors. Group. Process. Intergroup Relat. 25, 1084–1106 (2022).
Moran, D. & Taylor, L. K. Outgroup prosocial behaviour among children and adolescents in conflict settings. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 44, 69–73 (2022).
Paluck, E. L. Is it better not to talk? Group polarization, extended contact, and perspective taking in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 36, 1170–1185 (2010).
Hogg, M. A. & van Knippenberg, D. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 35 (ed. Zanna, M. P.) 1–52 (Elsevier, 2003).
Paluck, E. L. & Shepherd, H. The salience of social referents: a field experiment on collective norms and harassment behavior in a school social network. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 103, 899 (2012).
Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A. & Turner, J. C. Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self‐categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 29, 97–119 (1990).
Terry, D. J. & Hogg, M. A. Group norms and the attitude–behavior relationship: a role for group identification. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 22, 776–793 (1996).
Crandall, C. S. & Eshleman, A. A justification–suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychol. Bull. 129, 414 (2003).
Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A. & O’brien, L. Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82, 359–378 (2002).
Durrheim, K., Quayle, M. & Dixon, J. The struggle for the nature of “prejudice”: “prejudice” expression as identity performance. Polit. Psychol. 37, 17–35 (2016).
Pinus, M. et al. Emotion regulation contagion. Preprint at OSF Preprints https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/8ndz2 (2023).
Villamil, F. & Balcells, L. Do TJ policies cause backlash? Evidence from street name changes in Spain. Res. Polit. 8, 205316802110585 (2021).
Bilewicz, M. The dark side of emotion regulation: historical defensiveness as an obstacle in reconciliation. Psychol. Inq. 27, 89–95 (2016).
Psaltis, C., Carretero, M. & Čehajić-Clancy, S. (eds.) History Education and Conflict Transformation: Social Psychological Theories, History Teaching and Reconciliation (Springer Nature, 2017).
Janković, A. & Čehajić-Clancy, S. The power of the media on peace and reconciliation processes: representing former enemy groups as moral versus immoral matters. J. Pacif. Rim Psychol. 15, 183449092110025 (2021).
Weiss, C. M., Ran, S. & Halperin, E. Educating for inclusion: diversity education programs can reduce prejudice toward outgroups in Israel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2218621120 (2023). This paper demonstrates the long-term impact of interventions implemented in the field of education using field experiments.
Bruneau, E., Casas, A., Hameiri, B. & Kteily, N. Exposure to a media intervention helps promote support for peace in Colombia. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 847–857 (2022).
Casas, A. & Hameiri, B. Giving peace a chance: lessons from translational research in Colombia. Peace Confl. J. Peace Psychol. 28, 284–291 (2022).
Murrar, S. & Brauer, M. Overcoming resistance to change: using narratives to create more positive intergroup attitudes. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 28, 164–169 (2019).
Tropp, L. R. in The Social Psychology of Intractable Conflicts Vol. 27 (eds Halperin, E. & Sharvit, K.) 159–171 (Springer, 2015).
Weiss, C. M. Diversity in health care institutions reduces Israeli patients’ prejudice toward Arabs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2022634118 (2021).
Schumann, K. An affirmed self and a better apology: the effect of self-affirmation on transgressors’ responses to victims. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 54, 89–96 (2014).
Beneda, M., Witkowska, M., Khachatryan, N., Grigoryan, N. & Bilewicz, M. Change in perceived outgroup morality increases forgiveness in post-genocide settings — study of the moral exemplars. TPM — Test. Psychom. Methodol. Appl. Psychol. 25, 193–212 (2018).
Voelkel, J. G., Ren, D. & Brandt, M. J. Inclusion reduces political prejudice. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 95, 104149 (2021).
Moss, S. M., Uluğ, Ö. M. & Acar, Y. G. Doing research in conflict contexts: practical and ethical challenges for researchers when conducting fieldwork. Peace Confl. J. Peace Psychol. 25, 86–99 (2019).
Acknowledgements
Production of this article was supported by a grant awarded to S.C.-C. by the Swedish Research Council (grant number 2020-01674).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.C.-C. researched data for the article. All authors contributed substantially to discussion of the content, wrote the article and reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Psychology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Čehajić-Clancy, S., Halperin, E. Advancing research and practice of psychological intergroup interventions. Nat Rev Psychol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00330-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00330-z
